junk drawer stuff
January 23, 2009
random stuff from my junk drawer that i didn’t get to this week:
you may remember when the koskids and other various moonbats googlebomb’d George W. Bush by linking his name to the word ‘failure’ so that when you googled the word ‘failure,’ you’d come up with whitehouse.gov? heh. apparently, follow through is not a moonbat trait because google didn’t disarm the bomb and now The One is a failure after only two days in the white house.
_____
to once again demonstrate the graciousness of the Bush family, barbara and jenna left a letter in the wh house for sasha and malia obama. it is tender, and kind, and welcoming. i can only hope some of that rubs off on The One and his wife. on the very day, the Bush twins left that note for his daughters, obama was slamming their dad in front of the world in his inaugural speech.
UPDATE: hotair just put up a video of the Bush daughters reading this letter. i didn’t know it was out there or i would have added it earlier.
_____
herOin… i’m sure you can figure out what the ‘o’ stands for these days and i am so not making this up.
_____
feeling the hope and change in the air? obviously young jeezy doesn’t. you can go here for the racist lyrics.
Posted in George W. Bush, barack obama, democrats, liberals, moonbats, ugly stuff
'a wise man's heart directs him toward the right but a foolish man's heart directs him toward the left'
ecclesiastes 10:2
content rss
facebook
twitter
January 23rd, 2009 at 2:12 pm
At least the “failure” googlebomb has some validity to where it now sends you.
I agree. If one is seeking to unite the country, the last thing you do is badmouth the 59 million who didn’t vote for you. Besides, he and various libs tend to forget, the 59 million who didn’t vote for B. Hussein represent somewhere in the area of 80-85% of the wealth of the country. Before the election, one man equals one vote. Afterwards, $1 equals one vote. He either caters to those with money, or his booty is gone, and as a collective group libs aren’t the one’s who have the money, conservatives are.
What, the Chicago Machine is the only one’s allowed to cash in on B. Hussein’s name? No reason heroin dealers shouldn’t move in on the action, too. You gotta hit this market while it’s hot. Won’t be long until even the junkies, in their desire to distance themselves from The One, won’t want to buy any brand with B. Hussein’s name on it.
And I expect rappers and hip-hop “artists”(?) to to give B. Hussein a hummer regardless. They are, however, some of the best and brightest the Dems/libs have to offer.
January 23rd, 2009 at 2:47 pm
I hope the implication here isn’t that Obama condones heroin use. That would be over the top even for you people.
I also notice that your slamming of hip hop artists and their craft is ridiculous. Note that this is what. they. do. They speak of conditions and culture and insults. You obviously are not hip.
And who gives a flip about the Shrub ho’s. If Barack has any sense, he through that letter away before his daughters could see it.
January 23rd, 2009 at 2:59 pm
“Shrub’s ho’s” WTF????
Jared I am so sick of your trash. They were never elected to office. They are private citizens. There is no “Ho” behavior and if there were so f’ing what? Are you now the moral police? That is laughable since democrat men can’t keep their pants on and democrat women are so fugly that no one wants to touch them.
So keep your adolescent wet dreams to yourself and shut the hell up.
Sorry Kate. I am sick of their bashing of the Bush family.
January 23rd, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Hip Hop has always been racist, anti-police, anti-women. I think we will see a resurgence of the popularity of gangsta rap too. I think Obama likes to identify with this group because he sees some benefits to it. But frankly, he couldn’t be further from this group. He’s a poser. He can become whatever you want him to become.
Jeezy is so yesterday anyway so who cares about him. I am more concerned about the fake entitlement and blatant disrespect that this message brings to young black kids coming up.
January 23rd, 2009 at 3:18 pm
If what was in that video was “hip,” then I’m very glad I’m not. I suppose it’s also hip to suggest someone might be implying something when they aren’t, and to say inappropriate things about politician’s children. Such is the mindless culture in which we find ourselves, moulded and crafted by the self-appointed intelligensia who view themselves as “enlightened.” Hard not to laugh at their delusional view of themselves, so I do it anyway.
BTW, if anyone ever wants to laugh at some major hate-filled whackos, dial up democraticunderground.com and observe the cesspool of their natural habitat.
January 23rd, 2009 at 3:35 pm
Here’s something I’ve noted on various lib pol sites and blogs today.
B. Hussein launched missles into Pakistan which killed 10 individuals thought to be militants. Had this been a week ago, the libs would have been questioning whether they really were militants, why we were invading the sovereignty of another nation and how disrespectful that is and that’s why the rest of the world hates us, etc….. You’ve heard it all before just as I have.
But it didn’t happen 10 days ago, it happened today.
Now, these same lib pol sites and blogs are singing B. Hussein’s praises, are absolutely certain these individuals were militants, and even if they were civilians to heck with them, and that Pakistan can just get over it.
Mark it down. On the 3rd full day, liberals find it fashionable to kill brown people.
January 23rd, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Nice to see Obama’s atmosphere of “bipartisanship” lasted all of 3 days:
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/23/obama-reminds-gop-in-stimulus-meeting-i-won/
“During a morning meeting with congressional leaders from both parties, President Obama acknowledged the philosophical differences between his stimulus package and the Republican plan – but, sources familiar with the conversation said, Obama then noted: “I won.”…
But perhaps taking a cue from Obama’s “I won” line when Democrats were asked if they were concerned about Republicans blocking the package, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had a swift one-word answer: “No.”
Ahhh yes, hope and change.
January 23rd, 2009 at 4:12 pm
“I hope the implication here isn’t that Obama condones heroin use. That would be over the top even for you people.”
I don’t believe anyone said that he condones heroin use, did they? I can only imagine what the libs would be saying if heroin was being stamped with Bush’s name on it.
“I also notice that your slamming of hip hop artists and their craft is ridiculous. Note that this is what. they. do.”
What a lame excuse for a profane, immature, ignorant laced rant, but hey I would expect nothing less.
“You obviously are not hip.”
Oh, gosh, Jared I don’t know what we all will do knowing that we aren’t hip.
“And who gives a flip about the Shrub ho’s.”
You stay classy, Jared. Keep reminding us where this country is headed….in a handbasket.
January 23rd, 2009 at 7:13 pm
“They speak of conditions and culture and insults. You obviously are not hip.”
Jared.
You dont know the first thing about hip.
I’ll bet you dont even know what the roots of rap and hip hop are but instead subscribe to the mainstream crap you’re fed on the radio and MTV.
Thinking the racist crap young sleezy said was hip is no worse than me assuming that you’re a racist black man because you approve of it ?
Just remember, You’re now an official memeber of the chickensh*t cut and run club. Maybe all you and your little a$$wipe wanna be gangstas will show us your sh*t and hop the next flight to Afghanistan and change our minds by showing us that your brand is actually worthy of its citizenship by taking out the real enemy ?
Punk.
January 23rd, 2009 at 9:37 pm
Our 6:00 news just narrated the letter that the Bush twins left for Obamas girls and I must say …
What a class act !
After having their fathers good name dragged thru the mud by just about every Obamanite and their leader these two young women took the high road and reminded America what a class act is all about.
January 23rd, 2009 at 10:09 pm
Hey, Ken and Kate.
Just wanted to let you know that I cited you both in my latest post. (Hope you don’t mind.)
http://dadecariaga.blogspot.com/2009/01/obama-bush-and-moral-consistency.html
January 24th, 2009 at 11:30 am
Hey Jared,
That was really classy how you called the Bush twins ho’s. Real nice, and intelligent I might add.
January 24th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
No, I don’t mind Dade and it was a very interesting post! I do have a few questions.
Would you also support an investigation and possible prosecution of former President Clinton for much of the same things that former President Bush did?
The main idea of your post was that Bush should be investigated for illegal wiretapping, torture, and for lying to America to get us into an “illegal” war.
As far as the wiretapping charge, it should be noted that President Clinton instituted a similar operation for much the same reason: terrorism. Also note how the New York Times, the propaganda arm of the DNC, stated that surveillance such as this was “a necessity”.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/01/under_clinton_ny_times_called.html
“‘If you made a phone call today or sent an e—mail to a friend, there’s a good chance what you said or wrote was captured and screened by the country’s largest intelligence agency.’ (Steve Kroft, CBS’ 60 Minutes)”
Sound familiar? Clinton was doing the same thing when he was president and the press even knew about it, yet not a word of protest was raised.
Torture? Once again, the rendition program of kidnapping wanted subjects and than returning them to countries known to torture, in the hopes of getting information out of them, began under Clinton.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200512/s1539284.htm
“Mr Scheuer, who headed the CIA unit that tracked Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden from 1996 to 1999, says he developed and led the “renditions” program.
He says the program includes moving prisoners without due legal process to countries without strict human rights protections.
“In Cairo, people are not treated like they are in Milwaukee,” he said.”
Egypt is known to severely torture prisoners, especially when trying to obtain information. So Clinton “outsourced” intelligence gathering to countries with horrible human rights records……and he knew it.
As far as lying about the intelligence involving Iraq, there have been investigations into this accusation. Most prominently was the Robb-Silberman Report which consisted of a bipartisan panel to look into these allegations.
http://www.nysun.com/editorials/robb-silberman-report/11597/
“The bipartisan panel chaired by federal judge Laurence Silberman and a former Democratic senator, Governor Robb of Virginia, “found no evidence of political pressure to influence the Intelligence Community’s pre-war assessments of Iraq’s weapons programs,” its report concluded. It was a distinguished commission whose members included Senator McCain, who is usually a darling of the press, and Lloyd Cutler, who served for a time as President Clinton’s White House counsel.”
Furthermore, there is more than enough evidence that Saddam had possessed the WMD’s under Clinton’s watch. Here is a great list of quotes from prominent democrats about their opinions of Saddam Husseins WMD program and it’s threat level.
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
Many of these quotes were under Bill Clinton’s administration, so either all these democrats were lying about their threat assessment of Saddam Huseein or Bush managed to manipulate the intelligence in 1998 while still governor of Texas. It’s also well documented that many foreign nations and the U.N. believed Saddam possessed these weapons.
Not only that, but there are also some who believe that Clinton’s war in Kosovo may have been “illegal” and since Kosovo certainly posed no threat to the United States was immoral, and yes innocent civilians died in that war at the hands of U.S. bombing.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47667
I personally have no problem with U.S. actions in Kosovo, I believe it was necessary. I’m curious though, Dade, I remember in your post saying that you couldn’t do anything about the wrongs committed before your lifetime. Certainly Clintons actions occurred during your lifetime, so do you favor an investigation and prosecution of him as you do Bush???
January 24th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
Excellent counterpoint, Ken!
And, yes, I would agree that the Clinton administration should be investigated as well.
In short, investigate and let the chips fall where they may!
Thanks for reading my post.
January 24th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
There’s a reason no investigations have taken place; Bush didn’t committ any crimes. The Dems have had the last 2 years of Congressional control had they wished to try to impeach and convict. They didn’t. Kook-cinich tried at least once, I recall, to bring forth articles, but they never got any wheels.
If the Dems had any evidence they would have moved on it. They didn’t. They still don’t. The talk of doing so now is to try and keep the anti-American moveon.org and codepink type nutsos all in a tizzy, but that’s it. B. Hussein would eat up huge amounts of political capital were he to allow it to go forward. He could try and wash his hands of it and claim he wasn’t pressing any investigations, that nature was just taking its course, but that would be a lie. He’s the prez and his party holds all the reins, he could make them shut it down if he wanted and everyone knows it. So there’s no escaping his being complicit should it happen.
It can also be asured that the same one’s calling for investigations now because of some imiginary violation of the Constitutuion were the same one’s who defended Clinton for committing perjury. You couldn’t even get them to admit what he had done, their lock-step answer was always “He was impeached over a BJ.” So these individuals are rather transparent in their supposed “Constitutional concerns” given their past actions.
B. Hussein knows he would be spending political capital beating a dead horse. He’s got bigger plans, and his totalitarian agenda of stripping individual rights by expanding gov’t control over its citizens daily lives in order to exert power via the Dem party for decades to come is of much more importance to him.
January 25th, 2009 at 8:01 am
At least you’re consistent, Dade, I’ll give you that. You seem to have a sense of fairness that applies to BOTH sides of the political “aisle”.
I think another reason you may not see such investigations is because a few prominent democrats may get caught up in it. There is a lot of talk about how much democrats knew about what was going on and they may not want that out in the public.
Only time will tell!!