obama v rush? we win.

Date January 26, 2009

i guess when The One talks from now on, we’re all suppose to listen — and obey. right?

obama recently said that republican leaders need to stop listening to rush limbaugh if they want to get anything done. ORLY? anyone who actually listens to rush limbaugh must have laughed as hard at that as i did - stuff like this energizes him! republicans in congress NEVER listen to rush anyway — if they did, the gop in this country wouldn’t be in the mess it’s in.

but getting back to obama and rush. it didn’t take long for rush to respond saying in part this:

‘If I can be made to serve as a distraction, then there is that much less time debating the merits of the trillion dollar debacle.

One more thing, Byron. Your publication and website have documented Obama’s ties to the teachings of Saul Alinksy while he was community organizing in Chicago. Here is Rule 13 of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals:

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”‘

that’s what obama wants to do with the conservative voice: target it, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. because if he can do that, he wins.

right now republicans, and conservatives specifically, are in the wilderness for the next four year. personally, i don’t want to wander around pointing fingers and squabbling with other republicans.

i want a plan. i want to push back effectively. i want to run toward the fight - not cower in the corner. i want to fight tough and fight smart. i want to advance the conservative agenda; the one that does NOT need to be re-tooled, updated, or modernized.

i think the gop has some good young conservative turks but their power is limited. in my opinion, rush limbaugh is the true leader of the republican opposition to The One and his agenda. hannity and mark levin (whom i adore) are also banging the drum. am i ranting? sure. is this too dramatic? no. the drama has already past with the election of a saul alinsky socialist.

i don’t want obama to succeed as president. i don’t want more liberalism in this country. i don’t want advanced socialist policies embedded into our country’s fabric.

when i was growing up, i learned a lot about conservatism from rush limbaugh. i ‘get’ him and rush is right. we need to know the strategy being used against us (such as rule #13 of alinsky’s rules for radicals) if we are ever to rebound politically and protect our values.

and we need to use their own strategy ourselves against them: the leftists in this country. so go buy alinsky’s book and study it.

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

27 Responses to “obama v rush? we win.”

  1. MVP_GA said:

    OH. MY. F’IN GAWD! This has to be the most ridiculous post I have ever read in my life! Talk about extremism, fearmongering, and anger! OH Miss Blogger! You seem to need therapy and take your pitiful band of merry men and women with you. Your little pitiful call to arms is sad. YOU LOST THE ELECTION BITCH! What is it about that that you don’t understand? Rush Limbaugh is your leader? He’s a frickin junkie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Conservative values? What like refuse the right of a woman to manage her own body? Like refuse a couple who is of the same sex a marriage license? What like take money that buys food for a single mother and her kids away? You people make me puke! Conservatives = New Nazism!

    WE ARE IN CHARGE FOR THE NEXT 4-8 YEARS. SIT THE FUG DOWN AND SHUT THE FUG UP!

  2. kate said:

    hi mvp_ga
    it’s me, miss blogger, aka ‘bitch’

    i understand that moonbats run the risk of exploding head syndrome, but please refrain from calling me or anyone else on this blog names. thanks so much! have a great day!

  3. garden_chick said:

    Rush Limbaugh is your leader???! That’s rich. Because that spells certain disaster for conservatives in this country. Which is not an entirely bad thing.

    And for you rightwing moonbats who mocked me like Micky and oh god I have no idea who else, get help for your anti-social behavior. Get on the Peace Train Micky.

  4. Ted said:

    Hmmmmmmm. According to the “logic” (?) of mvp_ga, when their side lost in 2000, they should have just sit back and shut up. Wonder why they didn’t take their own advise?

    Funny how those who claim they want “rights” expanded continually promote programs and ideas which give more power to a centralized gov’t which strips citizens of their individual freedoms. Any gov’t strong enough to give the citizens all they want is strong enough to take it all away. The left wishes to kill unborn children in the name of their god of selfishness, redefine traditional marriage which has worked quite well for 1,000’s of years, and grow social programs which, if they had worked, would have already alleviated the USA of ever having those in need. But they were never meant to work, it was never the purpose for them to work. The left doesn’t want results, they want gov’t dependents, which is the worst form of slavery and serfdom. Liberalism = New Stalinism.

    The left also continually forgets that of the 46% of us who didn’t vote for BHO, we are the one’s who own 80-85% of the wealth of the country. They can try all the various tax code changes or anything else they want to do, but there’s way too many ways to shelter income, and people with capital aren’t going to invest in what they know will be a failed plan. And without the capital investment of the people with money, any plan BHO tries will not work. So far, he has offered nothing to entice capital. And as long as he continues to push his socialist agenda, he won’t.

    And BTW, fascism is a subset of Marxism, which is definately left of center. If you had ever read and studied the political ideology of both Mussolini and Hitler, they were big admirers of Marx, and in particular that of socialism.

  5. bonny_bgood said:

    “The left wishes to kill unborn children in the name of their god of selfishness”

    NO!!!! That is the common LIE used to divide us on the incidiary topic of abortion. Shame on you.

    The Left does NOT wish to kill unborn children because they aren’t children until they are viable outside the womb. What the Left does value is women’s rights and the inherent ability to make decisions for their own selves about their own bodies even when she becomes pregnant. You are obviously a man and a stupid one at that.

  6. Sandra_M_Martin said:

    “The left wishes to kill unborn children in the name of their god of selfishness, redefine traditional marriage which has worked quite well for 1,000’s of years, and grow social programs which, if they had worked, would have already alleviated the USA of ever having those in need. But they were never meant to work, it was never the purpose for them to work. The left doesn’t want results, they want gov’t dependents, which is the worst form of slavery and serfdom. Liberalism = New Stalinism.”

    Oh this is freakin rich! You people are amazingly dim aren’t you? You have no idea what Liberalism is or Stalinism for that matter. Liberalism is based on freedom. Freedom to be all you want to be, can be, and should be. It IS government responsibility and those who have the means and ability to make things better, to help those weaker, less fortunate, and disinfranchised from society. It IS governments role to step up and help. To say that Liberals never wanted or intended their programs and policies to be successful is just another lie. We believe EVERYONE even the conservative has a right to be taken care of if they need it. PERIOD.

    Quit perpetuating a lie just to promote an angry feeding frenzy among your group.

  7. Ted said:

    More on the topic that kate introduced, that BHO felt the need to mention Rush in a meeting tells me that it bothers him someone disagrees with him. He’s got a fragile ego and, in typical lib fashion, wants to silence those who promote a way other than his way.

    Anyone recall Bush warning Democrats that they need to quit listening to Randi Rhodes, Mike Malloy, Ed Shultz, Thom Hartmann, or any number of other lib radio types if they want to get along with Republicans? No. That’s because he didn’t care what those radio people said or to whom the Democrats listened. Go to any number of lib blogs and pol sites and you’ll see a stream of desires for Limbaugh, Hannity, and Fox Network in general, to be forceably removed from the air. You just don’t see that on conservative blogs and pol sites when it comes to liberal radio or the liberal media.

    In their typical totalitarian way, the left wants to silence the opposition. If they weren’t worried, if they believed themselves to have the correct solutions to the issues, they wouldn’t be desiring that conservatives “SIT THE FUG DOWN AND SHUT THE FUG UP!”, because their actions would prove them to be unmistakably precise. But what’s to happen to them when BHO’s economic package doesn’t work? And, it isn’t going to work.

    Basically, the more the libs complain, the more I’m going to give them reasons to complain. I’m not backing off, I’m keeping the pressure on, and there’s nothing they can do about it. And that’s what really eats at them, because they want so much to be able to control my life, and that of everyone who disagrees with them.

  8. micky said:

    Liberals can never come with a constructive counter point so its always ,
    MVP;
    “You seem to need therapy ”

    Garden chick;
    ” get help for your anti-social behavior.”

    ” refuse the right of a woman to manage her own body? ”

    Who said that ? Wheres that law written ?
    maybe if she truly managed her body she wouldnt screwing any Toms Dick is Harry and wouldnt of got knocked up in the first place.
    And then you still have to deal with the fact that you cant claim the right to operate my your own body when its in the process of killing someone.

    “What like take money that buys food for a single mother and her kids away?”

    Care to share an example, of any of your assertions ?
    Did you know that conservatives are the most charitable people on the planet ?
    Probably not.

    “Like refuse a couple who is of the same sex a marriage license? ”

    Actually, it was the black majority in your party that contributed the most votes on prop 8.
    At least know who the hell you’re b*tching at.

    “WE ARE IN CHARGE FOR THE NEXT 4-8 YEARS. SIT THE FUG DOWN AND SHUT THE FUG UP!”

    Make me.

    Ted.
    MVP wont engage in any conversation that involves a pre text such as yours.

    Hes obviously not able to do more than drop his little troll turds and sit back in total awe of himself.

    Ya hear me MVP ?
    Punk, you couldnt make a point if your miserable life depended on it.

    Thats go for you too Garden chick.
    Can you actually make a point other than your own idiocy ?

    Peace, yea right.
    Get ready, the right is going to ream you guys a new one for at least 4 years.
    if I can help it I’ll get that empty suit out of office before that.
    See what happens when you and your delusional party tries to shove your socialist wealth redistribution down our throats. The same thing that happened when this country was born is what will happen.
    We will not be victims of government that wants to strip us of our private property, wealth and individualism.
    I’ll bet you dont have clue as to how Obama is repeating all the mistakes made in the past by revisiting the “New Deal” communal ownership of property socialism and the banking system.
    You just want your free medical, and someone to pay your bills while not having to be held responsible for any of your own actions.

  9. Dade Cariaga said:

    Umm….Ted says:

    Hmmmmmmm. According to the “logic” (?) of mvp_ga, when their side lost in 2000, they should have just sit back and shut up. Wonder why they didn’t take their own advise?

    By which, I assume he means “advice.” But, no worries. I’m in agreement here. Lord knows, except for a brief period right after 911, I never shut up about Junior. It’s a free country. Rant on, says I.

    Funny how those who claim they want “rights” expanded continually promote programs and ideas which give more power to a centralized gov’t which strips citizens of their individual freedoms.

    Do you mean, for example, the authorization for the government to wire tap my phone calls without a court order? Or to accuse me of being a terrorist and then hold me without access to counsel and without being formally charged indefinitely? Is that what you mean be “centralized government?”

    Any gov’t strong enough to give the citizens all they want is strong enough to take it all away. The left wishes to kill unborn children in the name of their god of selfishness, redefine traditional marriage which has worked quite well for 1,000’s of years, and grow social programs which, if they had worked, would have already alleviated the USA of ever having those in need. But they were never meant to work, it was never the purpose for them to work. The left doesn’t want results, they want gov’t dependents, which is the worst form of slavery and serfdom. Liberalism = New Stalinism.

    satire mode = on
    Yes, we want to kill unborn children. It makes us feel great! In fact, I can barely get an erection unless I get to kill something beforehand.
    satire mode = off

    Regarding what Ted refers to as “traditional marriage,” well, um, it hasn’t exactly worked for thousands of years, has it? You see, Ted, a little reading would inform you that marriage has, for most of human history, been viewed as an exchange of chattel. Or, is that what you want to return to? Women as property? Maybe you should ask the GOP to write that into their platform.

    The left also continually forgets that of the 46% of us who didn’t vote for BHO, we are the one’s who own 80-85% of the wealth of the country. They can try all the various tax code changes or anything else they want to do, but there’s way too many ways to shelter income, and people with capital aren’t going to invest in what they know will be a failed plan. And without the capital investment of the people with money, any plan BHO tries will not work. So far, he has offered nothing to entice capital. And as long as he continues to push his socialist agenda, he won’t.

    Two points here: 1) Site your sources when you make a claim like that about the McCain voters own 80+% of the wealth in this country. I don’t see how you could prove that and frankly, it sounds like something you just pulled out of your ass. 2) If there are too many ways to shelter income, then you’ve got nothing to worry about with Obama’s stimulus plan, eh? So why are you bitching?

    And BTW, fascism is a subset of Marxism, which is definately left of center. If you had ever read and studied the political ideology of both Mussolini and Hitler, they were big admirers of Marx, and in particular that of socialism.

    You really need to read up on political theory there, homes. Fascism is the polar opposite of socialism. Fascism is government facilitating private industry; socialism is government promoting collective ownership of industry. Your statement is embarassingly ignorant.

    Get an education for Christ’s sake!

  10. kate said:

    ‘Rush Limbaugh is your leader???! That’s rich. Because that spells certain disaster for conservatives in this country. Which is not an entirely bad thing.’

    garden chick:

    my point is that rush will not be silenced just because The One tells him to. and conservatives - those with any backbone - won’t be either. rush has read obama’s playbook (rules for radicals). in fact he memorized it and can spit it right back at him. conservatives can learn a lot from rush’s fearlessness.

    and just for the record, conservatives aren’t going to disappear. nope. sorry, hun.

  11. micky said:

    “The Left does NOT wish to kill unborn children because they aren’t children until they are viable outside the womb”
    Bullsh*t.
    If a child is born thru a C section 2 months premature what’s your explanation for that ? Its not time ? It wasn’t meant to be ?
    In many case the child is not able to sustain its own breathing or nurse but it can survive outside the womb.
    but of course according to your idiocy we should just toss it because its not viable ?
    Do you know what the word “Viable ” means ?
    It means capable of living.
    Who are you to determine what is “living”, “life” or capable of living?

    Sandra, you wish you had a clue.

    Governments responsibility is only to give you the tools to succeed. Not the revenues as a result of labor.
    Your brand of liberalism is based on the liberty of one man being deemed more valuable than another mans and stripping from them what your ideology determines to be theirs. His land, his money, his children, his individuality via collectivism.
    Your rights stop where mine begin, you can only be so liberated.
    If anything, Liberalism will get us all killed. Democrats, pro-freedom dissidents, and liberals backing oppressive regimes to maintain “stability” is a policy that has been tried before, and failed in a very spectacular fashion.
    —————————–
    On topic.
    Obama is scared sh*tless of Rush.
    Rush basically got up there and said that everything Obama wants to do has been tried before and it failed, miserably.
    All Obama has done is to take a bunch of old failed ideas and paint a new pretty face on it. Obama is taking advantage of a generation that gets caught up in the idealistic euphoria that if we all just share everything and come together it will all work out. This has been tried before under more descript terms and is always tried by a new generation that admits it failed once before, but that they are the generation that can make it work this time.
    Its revisiting the exact description of insanity.
    To do the same thing over and over and expect different results

  12. Kevin said:

    Oh this is all just going to be too easy.

    “i guess when The One talks from now on, we’re all suppose to listen — and obey. right?”

    Right. Thanks for recognizing that.

    “republicans in congress NEVER listen to rush anyway — if they did, the gop in this country wouldn’t be in the mess it’s in.”

    Oh how naive. The reason the GOP is no more is because of Shrub and his failed policies. It is also because the GOP is FULL of old white haired men with old ideas.

    “that’s what obama wants to do with the conservative voice: target it, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. because if he can do that, he wins. ”

    Now Katie-Kins, that’s the most honesty out of your mouth since I have been visiting this little blog. I am glad you recognize the intent. I am also glad you finally have come to grips with the election results AND CONSEQUENSES.

    “right now republicans, and conservatives specifically, are in the wilderness for the next four year. personally, i don’t want to wander around pointing fingers and squabbling with other republicans.”

    LMFAO! But that my dear is what Republicans do best. It is well known that the GOP would rather eat their own then stand as one force.

    “i want a plan. i want to push back effectively. i want to run toward the fight - not cower in the corner. i want to fight tough and fight smart.”

    Is that what you want? Then you need to join my party. Yours hasn’t really fought tough or smart in a very long time.

    “i think the gop has some good young conservative turks but their power is limited.”

    Then they aren’t good or turks are they? Geez.

    “in my opinion, rush limbaugh is the true leader of the republican opposition to The One and his agenda. hannity and mark levin (whom i adore) are also banging the drum.”

    Limblob’s power is gone. He was unable to stop the GOP’s choice of the worst possible candidate to put up against Barack. He can’t muster enough support within his own base to make a difference. Within the next four years, the Fairness Doctrine will be restored. It will cut the head off of Limblob, Hannity and any of the other clanging righties out there.

    “i don’t want obama to succeed as president. i don’t want more liberalism in this country. i don’t want advanced socialist policies embedded into our country’s fabric.”

    This is the most naive of all! I bet you don’t want your vegetables at night either! You are painfully young. Go back to school, study hard and apply yourself, sit at the feet of our country’s leaders, and then open a blog.

  13. Sophia said:

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! GOOD ONE KEV. Y’ALL CAN HAVE LIMBAGH AS YOUR LEADER. HE’S A JUNKIE. AND KEN AND MICKEY MOUSE Y’ALL CAN KISS MY BEAUTIFUL BROWN ASS. IS THAT WORD ALLOWED MISS THANG?

  14. Ted said:

    Dade, I’ve got a little work to finish and then it’s off to watch 24, so I’ve got maybe 10 miuntes to bang this out.

    Read your bio and we’re about 75% the same interests. I’m one year older than you, and the main difference was our taste in books. I’m more of a Tom Clancy and John Grisham kinda reader and I’m big into historical writings.

    I’m not going to highlight your text and respond, but I’m sure your relate it to the correct thing.

    Centralized gov’t is growing the size and scope of the federal gov’t, of which I am opposed. I have no reason to believe the gov’t wire tapped your phone (unless you’re talking to terrorists) and the terrorists do not have either Constitutional nor Geneva Convention rights for various reasons. So in that respect, you’re assigning rights that were either not happening to the degree you believe they were or to people who were captured in battle while not wearing a recognized uniform, etc… I don’t have time to go into the details and you’ve likely heard them before and disagree anyway. So be it.

    I view both abortion and special rights for homosexuals to be un-Constitutional for reasons you’ve also likely already heard and disagree, the same arguments of which I agree. So be it.

    I have no source, it’s common sense. The Republicans are the party of the wealthy, right? What is it, something like the top 20% of all wage earners own 60% plus of the wealth in the country, I don’t remember exactly. So it only makes sense that the most wealthy are going to vote for the party that preserves their wealth, which by the admission of the D’s would be the R’s. So to say that the wealthy opposed BHO and didn’t vote for him is entirely reasonable, and one in which I’m confident will play out in the economy unless BHO caters to those with capital. So yes, I stand by my belief that the overwhelming majority of those who have the wealth did not vote for BHO, and he either caters to them or he’s in trouble.

    BHO’s plan will flatten, if not seriously injure, the economy. I want Americans to prosper, and his turning up the printing presses in the Fed and “redistributing” money is inflationary, He get passed what he desires, we’re going to have some major inflation. Expect food prices to jump in the next two or three years in the same manner they did in the mid to late 70’s.

    Fascism was born out of socialism. Like I said, read up on both Mussolini and Hitler. They both admired socialism. Hitler even called his the Nat’l Socialist Party, and he did that for a reason, because it was socialism with a strong emphasis on one’s nationality. You see, the main problem Mussolini and Hitler had with socialism, specifically the International Socialist, were they were not sufficiently nationalistic for either of them, which they believed if properly implemented would strengthen the movement of socialism. Otherwise they supported unions, they opposed discrimination based on social class, they rejected parliamentarianism, and were socialist in virtually every other governing view. So fascism, definately left of center.

    Otherwise let me make this quite clear; neither you nor any other lib can say anything to me I haven’t already heard from others just like you 10,000 times before. I know what the response of liberals are going to be on any particular issue before their leaders have told them what their opinion is going to be. There isn’t a single liberal on the face of the planet earth that I couldn’t argue their point of view better than they could, and do so in depths of understanding they could never comprehend. The libs can try and tell me “We don’t believe what you claim we believe. You’re misrepresenting us. Etc….” and I don’t care, because I’ve read and watched and observed and had enough of them admit to me the very things of which I say about them, so I already know what I’m saying is 100% true. I fully expect libs to lie. I fully expect libs to falsely believe they’re the intelligensia. I fully expect them to never admit when they’re wrong and to continually move the goalposts when they’re called out on something. They’ve been doing that very thing on any number of pol boards I’ve been on for the last 8 years; from Indymedia to DU to others, it’s always the same lies and moving the goalposts and weaving. No doubt that you’re no different. Boring, and ultimately not worth my time to try and discuss issues with the left because, like I said, I already know what they’re going to say, why they’re wrong, why they refuse to believe they’re wrong, and the excuses they’ll use.

    I have no doubt that you and I could get together and go to a ballgame or go hiking or any number of things and have a good time. You’re probably just a swell guy. And I’m one of the nicest people you’d ever meet in your life. But on-line, I’m not going to put up with the crap, and I know that when I’m dealing with the left I’m dealing with individuals who are married to an ideology rather than the truth. To many of your comrades who have come before you have soured me on hoping the left will ever be committed to anything other than their own selfish indulgences and doing what they can to use gov’t intervention to force people to live in their human secularist utopia, which is anything but a paradise to those who love real freedom. And the modern-day liberals version of freedom is not, nor will it ever be, defined as real freedom.

  15. Shannon said:

    Kevin,

    You mean sit down and obey like you did for President Bush? I don’t think so.
    The reason the GOP is in the shape it’s in is watered down liberalism. No one has had a strong conservative voice since Reagan, and a few inside congress.
    True, elections have consequences, and now the most uninformed electorate in history is going to figure that out the hard way.
    I could go on but I can only read your rants once.
    Oh and Kevin, you go ahead and sit at the feet of your country’s leaders, and it won’t be long before you no longer have a country.

  16. Shannon said:

    And this goes out to MVP_GA, Morpheus, and all the rest of you moonbats who show up here and spout four letter diatribes. I have one question. Do you kiss your mother with that mouth? Thanks for displaying your ignorance for all of us.

  17. Ken said:

    “OH. MY. F’IN GAWD! This has to be the most ridiculous post I have ever read in my life!”

    Obviously you’ve never read any of Kevin’s stuff, although it sounds like you have a lot in common. To wit:

    “YOU LOST THE ELECTION BITCH!”

    Very mature MVP!! You seem to possess the intellect and ability to argue a point as an 8 year old, congrats!

    “Rush Limbaugh is your leader? He’s a frickin junkie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

    So is the man you just put in the White House, genius:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR2007010201359.html

    God, talk about making this easy.

    “What like refuse the right of a woman to manage her own body?”

    No, its more like the concern of killing an unborn baby.

    “Like refuse a couple who is of the same sex a marriage license? ”

    Yep.

    “What like take money that buys food for a single mother and her kids away?”

    LOL!! Talk about fear mongering and ignorance!!!! Here’s a link for you:

    http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnStossel/2006/12/06/who_gives_to_charity

    “When you look at the data,” says Syracuse University professor Arthur Brooks, “it turns out the conservatives give about 30 percent more. And incidentally, conservative-headed families make slightly less money.”

    Ouch!! So much for that theory, what else you got????

    “WE ARE IN CHARGE FOR THE NEXT 4-8 YEARS. SIT THE FUG DOWN AND SHUT THE FUG UP!”

    I’ll make you a deal, we’ll sit down and be just as quiet as the left has been for the last 8 years, ok?

    “And for you rightwing moonbats who mocked me like Micky and oh god I have no idea who else, get help for your anti-social behavior.”

    Oh, I see, so anyone who disagrees with you displays “anti social” behavior”, got it.

    “Get on the Peace Train Micky.”

    Oh my gosh, the “peace” train? So tell me garden chick, now that Obama has bombed targets in Pakistan and killed innocents, is he a war criminal now? Will you demand his arrest and prosecution the way the left did for Bush? I’d love to hear your comment on this one. “Peace Train”, oh man that’s priceless!!!!

    “The Left does NOT wish to kill unborn children because they aren’t children until they are viable outside the womb.”

    That is your opinion. There are plenty of people in this country who think that life starts at conception, just a matter of disagreement.

    “You are obviously a man and a stupid one at that.”

    Again there’s that liberal “tolerance” I keep hearing about. If you disagree with them, you’re stupid!!!

    “Freedom to be all you want to be, can be,”

    I thought that was the Army?!?!?!

    “It IS governments role to step up and help.”

    Assistance to a certain degree. It is not the government’s job to make sure you have a job, car, house, money in the bank. That is not in the Constitution. The government’s job is to make sure that nobody stands in your way of pursuing your goals. It’s also the job of government to protect its people, something dems have failed again and again.

    “Quit perpetuating a lie just to promote an angry feeding frenzy among your group.”

    It seems to me most of the anger and name calling has come from the peaceful and tolerant left.

    “Oh this is all just going to be too easy.”

    Somehow, I doubt that Kevin.

    “Right. Thanks for recognizing that.”

    Don’t count on it.

    “I am also glad you finally have come to grips with the election results AND CONSEQUENSES.”

    Indeed, Kevin, its just a shame that you didn’t read where Kate’s quote came from and what it means. You need to go back and sue your high school because you seriously got ripped off on an education.

    “Yours hasn’t really fought tough or smart in a very long time.”

    Actually Kevin, your party hasn’t done much fighting at all. Its because of Republicans that Al Qaeda is hiding in the mountains of Pakistan in caves afraid to come out into the light. If the dems had their way the Taliban would still be in charge and Osama bin Laden would be running all over the world, kind of like he was when Clinton was in charge.

    As hard as the dems fought for our surrender in Iraq, Bush finished the job, not the democrats. Apparently you don’t follow current events either.

  18. Ken said:

    “AND KEN AND MICKEY MOUSE Y’ALL CAN KISS MY BEAUTIFUL BROWN ASS.”

    From the sounds of your post I wouldn’t know where to start kissing your ass….and certainly wouldn’t know where it ended.

  19. Dade Cariaga said:

    Ted,

    I appreciate your even-tempered (if long) response. And, I’m sure you are a good guy.

    The problem with these electronic fora is that they often cause people (myself included) to use the anonymity they afford as license to act like asses.

    So, while you and I are going to continue to disagree about politics, I shall refrain, henceforth, from tossing any nasty jibes at you. Or, I’ll try anyway.

    But, you’ll forgive me if I’m a little skeptical about this statement, eh?

    I already know what they’re going to say, why they’re wrong, why they refuse to believe they’re wrong, and the excuses they’ll use.

    ;-)

    Alright, Ted. Thanks again for the courteous response.

  20. micky said:

    Sophia.
    If you get lucky, go fu*k yourself.

    “Mickey Mouse “?

    Do you know how original that is ? No one has ever called me that before, good work girl.

    You and Kev are freaking lame brains who can only show us what balls you’ve got from behind a keyboard.
    If you had any balls you would of at least taken me up on my offer to engage in a debate/converstation that might of led to some understanding of something, ANYTHING !!!
    And yea Sophia, you sound like you had balls at one time and are just upset over loosing them. I wont even go into detail on that one, but have my suspicions.

    So I guess after my efforts were all just gonna have to sit back and watch you two act like little spoiled drunken b*tchs at a protest rally who couldnt drive a point home if your lives depended on it ?

  21. lisab said:

    well i think if it is ok abort babies

    then you should be able to shoot southerners

    it is far less controversial and will help stop global warming.

    southerners eat grits.

    grits are made out of corn.

    corn can be made into ethanol for cars.

    sooooo … shoot a southerner and save the environment.

  22. sam said:

    It’s amazing how blind these liberals are. Don’t you understand Obama is doing nothing more then giving you “women” and liberals what you want and throwing the low income a bone so that he can keep pulling your support in. Then evntually strip all of us of any freedom we have ever known. Keep believing him keep looking at him as a God and what you get you deserve but just remember when it happens this is what you have asked for by supporting someone who is willing to take the lives of innocent children and promotes partial birth abortion. And all of you women who believe you should have the right to kill your child b/c it will benefit you, its a disgrace you are no different then Hitlor, any real women would have the child and take on the responsibility! I am a woman and I am sooooooooo sick of hearing about womens rights get over it women have more power then they know its just that more then half of you are to stupid or selfish to use it for anything worth while or decent.

  23. leftrightleft said:

    You are exactly wrong. You like Rush and hate Obama because you have strong conservative opinions and pay attention. The 75% of the country who doesn’t pay attention, only knows that Rush said he hopes Obama fails and called him a negro. I know this is a simplification and out of context, but effectively, it doesn’t mater. This doesn’t help the GOP at all. It divides them.

  24. grannuille said:

    Abortion kills someone who 1. has a full, unique set of human DNA 2. thinks 3. has emotions 4. interacts 5. struggles to live 6. likes some tastes, songs and people’s voices and dislikes others 7. tests and methodically experiments with motor and sensory functions and therefore 8. is a complete, entire, existent human person, no matter how convenient it might be to imagine otherwise.
    Abortion does noy undo a pregnancy or te existence of th child. It does not prevent a birth. It does not give anyone anything but a baby corpse and a battered conscience. It it a birth — the birth of a dead baby. It is violent. It is painful for the mother (yes, she is a mother at conception) and the child (yes, she is a child at conception). It is an act of first-strike force against a defenseless little human child. If anything can ever be wrong, evil and unjustifiable it is abortion. A society that tries to pretend freedom has anything in common with abortion “rights”, is quickly losing the very idea of freedom and has long ago lost its sense of right and wrong. Liberalism once did stand for freedom, but gradually in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries the word was co-opted by people like the Nazi sympathizer Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, and similarly-oriented eugenecists whose open plan was to prevent the live birth of me and many millions like me. Liberalism is the essence of hypocrisy as it is today. That is why I’m glad I left the left.

  25. Bridget said:

    Once Rush told Liberals to “sit down and shut up!” Because Repub’s are in charge and we should get used to it.While bush was in office.

    Rush Stop Your Sniveling We are in Charge Now Shut up and sit down.

  26. it’s not really about rush | Blatherings Blog said:

    [...] to us all about obama and his minions’ plan to feverishly implement saul alinsky tactics. remember this? ‘If I can be made to serve as a distraction, then there is that much less time debating the [...]

  27. become a radical conservative | Blatherings Blog said:

    [...] talked a bit here about sal alinsky’s 1971 book ‘rules for radicals’, designed to teach radicals how [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>